Latest

Our latest articles, data updates, and announcements

Data Insight

How many lives would be saved if Africa had other regions’ child mortality rates?
Subtitle: Hypothetical number of children dying before the age of five in 2023.

Summary: Africa currently has 2,840,000 under-five deaths; if it had Europe’s child mortality rate that would fall to 200,000, saving 2,640,000 lives.

Tiles:
- Child deaths in Africa today: 2,840,000 deaths.
- If Africa had the child mortality rate of Asia: 960,000 deaths, 1,880,000 lives saved.
- South America: 690,000 deaths, 2,150,000 lives saved.
- Oceania: 650,000 deaths, 2,190,000 lives saved.
- North America: 480,000 deaths, 2,360,000 lives saved.
- Europe: 200,000 deaths, 2,640,000 lives saved.

Data source: Author calculations based on UN IGME (2025). License: CC BY.

How many lives would be saved if Africa had other regions’ child mortality rates?

One of the starkest expressions of global inequality is a child’s chance of survival. In 2023, 2.84 million children in Africa died before reaching their fifth birthday, giving the continent the highest child mortality rate of any region (5.9%).

The chart above shows a simple hypothesis: how many more African children would reach the age of five if it had the same child mortality rates as other regions?

If conditions in Africa improved enough to match Asia’s current child mortality rate (2%), 1.9 million of these 2.84 million children would survive.

If the child mortality rate were to drop to the European rate (0.4%), then 2.64 million children would be saved each year.

To learn more, read my colleague Max’s article on the progress made in reducing child mortality.

Article

Featured image

Almost all of the world’s mammal biomass is humans and livestock

Humans and livestock make up 95% of the world’s mammal biomass; wild mammals are just 5%.

Data Insight

Most homicide victims in the United States are men, but women face higher risk from partners

Two horizontal stacked bar charts comparing perpetrator categories for male and female homicide victims. Top chart labeled "Male victim" shows three segments labeled Partner, Family, and Other (acquaintances, strangers); the total male homicide rate is 5.4 deaths per 100,000 in 2023, with the Other category making up the largest share, family a smaller share, and partner the smallest. Bottom chart labeled "Female victim" shows three segments labeled Partner, Family, and Others; the total female rate is 2 deaths per 100,000, with the partner category a much larger share of female victims than it is for male victims. Key insight: American men are 2.7 times more likely to die from homicide than women, while women face relatively higher risk from partners. Data source: UN WPP (2024); UN ODC (2025). Note: The perpetrator of homicides is not always recorded, therefore the values shown may be an underestimate. License: CC BY.

American homicide victims are mostly men, except when the killer is an intimate partner

Almost 20,000 Americans were murdered in 2023.

The chart shows the homicide rates among male and female victims. Men were 2.7 times more likely to die by homicide than women.

We can see that for men, most of these murders were committed by friends, neighbors, acquaintances, or strangers (shown as “Other” in the chart) rather than a partner or family member. The opposite is true for women: intimate partners are the biggest threat.

Because the risks are different, the most effective responses may differ too. For women, reducing intimate partner violence is a key priority. For men, prevention is more often tied to crime, gangs, and violence among acquaintances or strangers.

Explore homicide rates for more countries.

Data Insight

China’s fertility rate has fallen to one, continuing a long decline that began before and continued after the one-child policy.

Line chart of China’s total fertility rate from 1950 to 2023, vertical axis labeled 0 to 7 births per woman. The chart shows a peak near 7 births per woman in the mid-1960s, followed by a sharp decline through the 1970s. The one-child policy is annotated as being rolled out in 1980 when the rate was already around 3 births per woman. After 1980 the rate continues downward, falling below 2 births per woman around the 1990s and staying at or below replacement level thereafter.

Data sources in the footer: Human Fertility Database; UN WPP (2024).

China’s fertility rate has fallen to one, continuing a long decline that began before and continued after the one-child policy

The 1970s were a decade shaped by fears about overpopulation. As the world’s most populous country, China was never far from the debate. In 1979, China designed its one-child policy, which was rolled out nationally from 1980 to curb population growth by limiting couples to having just one child.

By this point, China’s fertility rate — the number of children per woman — had already fallen quickly in the early 1970s, as you can see in the chart.

While China’s one-child policy restricted many families, there were exceptions to the rule. Enforcement differed widely by province and between urban and rural areas. Many couples were allowed to have another baby if their first was a girl. Other couples paid a fine for having more than one. As a result, fertility rates never dropped close to one.

In the last few years, despite the end of the one-child policy in 2016 and the government encouraging larger families, fertility rates have dropped to one. The fall in fertility today is driven less by policy and more by social and economic changes.

This chart shows the total fertility rate, which is also affected by women delaying when they have children. Cohort fertility tells us how many children the average woman will actually have over her lifetime. In China, this cohort figure is likely higher than one, but still low enough that the population will continue to shrink.

Explore more insights and data on changes in fertility rates across the world.
Data update

We now show the latest GDP growth projections from the IMF

In the spring and fall each year, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) publishes its World Economic Outlook. The latest report was published this past October.

The report helps us understand how economies around the world have grown over the past decades, and how they are projected to grow in the coming years.

You can see this in the chart for four of the world’s largest economies: the US, China, Germany, and Japan.

Explore the data for all countries in the interactive version of this chart
Annual GDP growth, 2000 to 2030. Small-multiple line chart of annual percent change in real GDP, inflation adjusted, with four panels for United States, China, Germany, and Japan. A solid line shows observed annual growth from 1980 to about 2023 and a dotted line shows projected growth to 2030. Y-axis ranges roughly from -5% to 15% with a horizontal zero line. Key patterns: United States shows modest positive growth with dips around 2009 and 2020 and modest projected growth near zero to low single digits; China shows higher growth in the 2000s that declines over time with a sharp dip around 2020 and projections trending downward toward lower single digits; Germany and Japan show generally low growth with occasional negative years and projections remaining near zero to low single digits. Data source text at the bottom reads: "Data source: International Monetary Fund (2025)". A CC BY license mark and the Our World in Data logo appear in the image.

Data Insight

Respiratory death rates from seasonal flu in older adults. World map showing estimated annual respiratory flu deaths per 100,000 people among adults aged 65+, average for the period 2002 to 2011. Highest rates are concentrated across much of sub-Saharan Africa, parts of South America (notably the southern cone), and South and Southeast Asia; lowest rates occur across Western Europe, North America, Russia, and Australia. Legend shows values from 0 to 90 per 100,000 in 10-unit increments; hatched areas indicate no data for some countries. Data source: Global Pandemic Mortality Project II (2019). License: CC BY. Note: Estimates do not include deaths from other complications of the flu, for example cardiovascular disease. Averages exclude the 2009 Swine flu pandemic.

Seasonal flu kills about 700,000 people each year across the world

Seasonal influenza is sometimes seen as a mild illness, but it remains a major cause of death. In serious cases, it can cause deadly complications such as pneumonia, strokes, and heart attacks. Researchers estimate that the flu causes about 400,000 respiratory deaths and 300,000 cardiovascular deaths globally each year.

The flu is most dangerous for infants and older adults. The map here shows rates of respiratory deaths caused by the flu in adults aged 65 and over, averaged across 2002–2011 (excluding the 2009 Swine Flu pandemic).

The data shows that death rates tend to be higher in South America, Africa, and South Asia than in Europe or North America.

I come from South America, and I found this surprising: most of what I hear about flu deaths tends to come from richer countries in the Northern Hemisphere. But the map shows that the flu is also deadly, in some cases even more so, in other regions where poverty, worse underlying health, limited access to healthcare, and lower vaccination coverage contribute to higher mortality.

One explanation for my misperception might be that surveillance and reporting are stronger in the countries that I associate with deaths from flu. Another could also be age differences: people in high-income countries tend to be older, so their total number of deaths — the ones you actually hear about — may still be higher, even if rates are lower.

When you consider the total death toll, you realize that the numbers are very large on the whole. Recall that the map only includes respiratory deaths, so the overall mortality is actually higher if we include other flu-related complications like cardiovascular disease.

Even if you account for the uncertainty of estimates in low-income countries — due to limited testing and death registration — the overall pattern remains striking: seasonal influenza kills hundreds of thousands each year, with many of these deaths in South America, Africa, and South Asia.

Read more in our article, “How many people die from the flu?”

Article

Featured image

Just ten species make up almost half the weight of all wild mammals on Earth

A small number of species dominate the distribution of wild mammal biomass.

Data Insight

Afghans say they are the least satisfied with their lives. Horizontal bar chart of average self-reported life-satisfaction ladder scores where 10 is the best possible life and 0 the worst. Highest scores: Finland 7.7, Denmark 7.5, Iceland 7.5, Sweden 7.3. Global average 5.3. Lowest scores: Malawi 3.3, Lebanon 3.2, Sierra Leone 3.0, Afghanistan 1.4. Data source: Wellbeing Research Centre (2025). Chart licensed CC BY to Our World in Data

Afghans report the lowest life satisfaction in the world

Measuring happiness is difficult, but one way to understand how satisfied people are with their lives is to simply ask them.

Self-reported life satisfaction is one key metric that researchers often rely on. It asks people to imagine a hypothetical ladder, where the best possible life for them is a 10, and the worst possible life is a 0. They then have to place their current position on the ladder.

The chart shows the three-year average scores from 2022 to 2024 for the four countries with the highest ratings and the four with the lowest.

Afghans reported the lowest life satisfaction in the world, far below any other country.

This incredibly low score has been replicated in other studies. Researchers recently compared Afghans’ life satisfaction with international datasets dating back to 1946 and found it was the lowest ever recorded. Two-thirds gave a score of 0 or 1 on the 10-point scale.

See self-reported levels of life satisfaction in your own country.

Data Insight

The image presents a bar graph titled "Women are the victims in most partner homicides." It compares the percentages of male and female victims of partner homicides across a selection of 9 OECD countries.

The countries listed include the United States, Canada, Netherlands, United Kingdom, France, Spain, Germany, Switzerland, and Italy.

The exact percentages vary, but for all countries, women are much more likely than men to be killed by their intimate partner

The data sources for this graph are the United Nations World Population Prospects from 2024 and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime from 2025. The graph is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution to Our World in Data.

Women are more likely to be victims of partner homicide

Women are much more likely than men to be killed by their intimate partner. The chart shows this across nine OECD countries in 2023.

These deaths are rarely isolated events. Research shows that partner homicides are usually the endpoint of a long pattern of coercive control — behaviors such as surveillance, isolation, intimidation, restrictions on daily life, and physical violence.

Recognizing both the gender imbalance and its roots in coercive control can help focus support services, encourage family and friends to act sooner, and increase social pressure against abusive behavior.

While women face the highest risk from intimate partners, men make up about 80% of homicide victims globally. The gender split in partner homicides is therefore a striking exception.

Explore more data on homicide rates where the perpetrator is an intimate partner.

Data Insight

The image illustrates the growth of global Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita from 1994 to 2024. A line graph displays a steady increase in GDP per capita, starting just above $11,000 in 1994 and rising to around $21,000 towards the end of the timeline. The graph features a clear upward trend with slight fluctuations but overall presents a consistent growth pattern over the years. The title at the top reads "Growth of global GDP per capita over the last three decades," and the data is adjusted for inflation. 

The footer notes the data sources as Eurostat, OECD, IMF, and World Bank, 2025, and mentions that the data is expressed in international dollars at 2021 prices.

Growth of global GDP per capita has been remarkably steady over the past three decades

This chart shows global GDP per capita, adjusted for inflation. Looking at the world economy from this perspective, it is the steadiness of this change that stands out to me. Average incomes per person have risen at a fairly constant pace of roughly 2% per year, interrupted only by the 2008–09 financial crisis and the 2020 pandemic.

One reason this is noteworthy, in my view, is that national economies changed a lot during the same period. Some economies slowed, many others grew, and more generally, some major political shifts took place. Yet when all of this is aggregated, the global average followed a remarkably smooth upward track.

The line in the chart ends in 2024, so it does not yet capture more recent developments. But a few recent articles, such as this one from The Economist, look at data for 2025 and point to the same stability.

Past trends may not continue in the future. But this data reminds us that global economic aggregates can develop more steadily than the headlines might make us think.

Read more about what economic growth is and why it is important.

Article

The end of progress against extreme poverty?

In the last three decades, the world has made progress against extreme poverty faster than ever before. But unless the poorest economies start growing, this period of progress against the worst form of poverty is over.

Data Insight

How much more CO2 can we emit while staying below 1.5°C, 1.7°C and 2°C?

Bar chart showing estimates of remaining carbon dioxide budgets that give a 50% likelihood of staying below each temperature level, relative to pre-industrial levels. A baseline label shows global emissions in 2025 at 42 gigatonnes (Gt) per year. Three vertical bars show remaining CO2 budgets: stay below 1.5°C — 170 Gt, labeled as 4 years of current emissions, with a note that if emissions stay at 2025 levels the 1.5°C budget will be exhausted within 4 years; stay below 1.7°C — 525 Gt, labeled as 12.5 years of current emissions; stay below 2°C — 1055 Gt, labeled as 25 years of current emissions, with an annotation saying that by 2050 we will have exhausted the 2°C budget unless emissions are reduced now. Footer note states these estimates have uncertainty and depend on changes in non-CO2 greenhouse gases such as methane and nitrous oxide. Data sources listed as IPCC, Forster et al. (2025) and Global Carbon Project (2025). License CC BY.

How much CO2 can the world emit while limiting global temperature rise?

In 2015, countries worldwide signed the Paris Agreement, aiming to keep the global temperature rise “well below 2°C” and limit this increase to 1.5°C.

To meet these targets, there are limits to the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) that can be emitted. These are called carbon budgets. Every year we emit more CO2, these budgets shrink. (That’s because total warming is roughly proportional to cumulative CO2.)

In the chart, you can see estimates for how much CO2 the world can emit — from the start of next year — while staying below different levels of warming. This is based on having a 50% likelihood of staying below it; if we wanted to guarantee that we didn’t pass these temperatures, our budget would be much smaller.

To get a sense of perspective, we’ve compared each budget with the projected amount of CO2 that the world is expected to emit in 2025. This tells us how many years we have left if emissions stay at their current levels.

At current emission rates, the 1.5°C budget would run out around 2030. It seems implausible that global emissions will fall quickly enough to avoid this.

The 2°C budget would last until mid-century. By taking action on climate change, we buy ourselves more time and can avoid this level of warming.

This is based on the latest estimates from the Global Carbon Project. See how emissions are changing in your country.

Data Insight

Global CO2 emissions, with projections for 2025. Line chart showing historical global carbon dioxide emissions from 1850 to 2025 (projection) with three series: total emissions, fossil fuel and industry emissions, and land-use change emissions. Key insight: projected total emissions are about 43 billion tonnes in 2025, with no change from 2024; fossil emissions are about 38.9 billion tonnes, a 1 percent increase; land-use change emissions are about 4.1 billion tonnes, an 11 percent decrease, meaning the decline in land-use emissions offset the small rise in fossil emissions. Trends: all series rise slowly until the mid-20th century, then fossil and total emissions increase steeply from around 1950 to the present while land-use emissions fluctuate and decline in recent years. Axes: x-axis 1850 to 2025 (projection); y-axis labeled from 0 to 40 billion tonnes with ticks at 10 billion t increments. Footer note: projections come with uncertainty and are based on incomplete data for this year; fossil emissions do not include cement carbonation. Data source: Global Carbon Project (2025). License: CC BY.

Global CO2 emissions from fossil fuels are likely to increase this year, while those from land-use change will fall

Have global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions gone up or down this year?

The latest projections from the Global Carbon Project give us some insight. Their researchers and analysts do invaluable work in estimating greenhouse gas emissions worldwide, helping us understand how the situation is evolving.

Today, they published their latest “carbon budget”. The chart shows their historical estimates, as well as their projections for 2025.

They project that this year, emissions from fossil sources — that is, from fossil fuels and industrial processes — will increase by around 1%. Emissions from all three fuels — coal, oil, and gas — are expected to increase. Meanwhile, emissions from land-use change have decreased due to fewer extreme wildfires and reduced deforestation in South America.

This reduction in land use may offset the increase from fossil fuels, resulting in a global total similar to last year. Note that estimates for land-use emissions are much less certain than for fossil fuels.

While many countries have made progress in reducing emissions, global fossil emissions continue to rise. To tackle climate change, they need to peak and rapidly decrease in the coming years and decades.

This is based on the latest estimates from the Global Carbon Project. Explore how global and national emissions are changing.
Announcement

Watch Hannah Ritchie talk about her new book on climate change, Clearing the Air

Hannah Ritchie, our Deputy Editor and Science Outreach Lead, was on several podcasts recently to talk about her new book, Clearing the Air.

The book tackles 50 of the most common myths and misconceptions about climate change. Hannah wrote it to “give people clear and honest answers to their questions, concerns, and doubts about whether we stand a chance (not to spoil the cliffhanger, but we do).”

Check out the episodes with Hannah:

Clearing the Air was also recently included in The Financial Times’s “Four hopeful guides to tackling climate change”.

The book is available now in the UK — and readers in most of Europe can also have it delivered.

Order Hannah’s book

Stay tuned for its release in other regions! The US version will be available on March 3, 2026.

A featured image for the article announcing Hannah Ritchie's upcoming book, Clearing the Air, to be released on September 18th 2025 in the UK.
New feature

You can now copy our charts to the clipboard for easy sharing

Just click the “Share” icon in the bottom right of any chart and select “Copy chart as image”. No need to take a screenshot.

From the same menu you also have options to embed our interactive charts (including archived versions) in any website, share the link to the chart via different apps (such as mail or messages), and copy the link to your clipboard.

If instead you want to download the image file, you can do that too by clicking the “Download” icon to the left of the “Share” icon.

We design our work to have an impact beyond what our team can achieve directly. That’s why we use a permissive Creative Commons license and include these easy options to share and download our charts.

Try it out
A screenshot showing how to copy chart images to the clipboard for sharing

Data Insight

Road death rates can vary more than 20-fold, even across rich countries.

Horizontal bar chart showing number of deaths from road injuries per 100,000 people in 2021 for 16 high-income countries; deaths include drivers and passengers, motorcyclists, cyclists, and pedestrians. Highest is Saudi Arabia at 45 per 100,000, followed by Oman 36 and United Arab Emirates 20. United States 11, Chile 9.5. Mid-range examples: Australia 4.8, Italy 4.8, Canada 4.4, France 4.4, Spain 3.7, Germany 3.3. Lower end: Japan 2.2, United Kingdom 2, and Norway, Singapore, and Sweden each 1.9. Annotation states that death rates in Middle Eastern high-income countries are 10 to 24 times higher than in those with the safest roads. Data source listed as IHME, Global Burden of Disease (2024); note that the metric is age-standardized for cross-country comparisons; image marked CC BY.

There are huge differences in death rates from road injuries, even across high-income countries

Roads in rich countries tend to be much safer than those in low- and middle-income countries. Cars are more modern, infrastructure is better, and driving laws are stricter and better enforced.

However, there are still huge differences between high-income countries. This is obvious from the chart, which shows death rates from road injuries across various countries. Rates can vary more than 20-fold.

I was recently surprised to find that my country, the United Kingdom, has some of the safest roads in the world, alongside Sweden, Singapore, and Norway. It can be easy to complain about the situation in our own country without considering what things are like elsewhere.

Road deaths are incredibly high in several Middle Eastern countries, like Saudi Arabia, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates. These countries tend to have far more high-speed highways, drivers often cover much longer distances, and the enforcement of regulations such as speed limits, seatbelt use, and driving distractions is weaker. These countries have reduced fatality rates in recent years, but still have much higher death tolls than other rich countries.

Read my article on how the United Kingdom built some of the world’s safest roads.

Article

Featured image

Anxiety is one of the world’s most common health issues. How have treatments evolved over the last 70 years?

Anxiety affects at least hundreds of millions of people every year. What treatments are available, and how have they changed over time?

Data Insight

This scatter plot illustrates the relationship between political corruption and electoral democracy indices for various countries in 2024. The vertical axis represents the political corruption index, ranging from 0, indicating less corruption, to 1, indicating more corruption. The horizontal axis shows the electoral democracy index, also ranging from 0 to 1, where higher values suggest greater levels of democracy.

Key countries are labeled, including Myanmar, Russia, India, Hungary, Ethiopia, China, Tanzania, Singapore, Romania, Brazil, Poland, and Denmark. Each country is represented by a point on the graph, with countries like Denmark and Singapore positioned closer to the lower end of the corruption scale and higher on the democracy scale, indicating they are less corrupt and more democratic. In contrast, countries like Myanmar and Russia are closer to the higher end of the corruption index. 

The data is sourced from V-Dem, with estimates based on expert evaluations. The findings suggest that as countries become more democratic, they tend to experience lower levels of corruption. The chart is titled "Countries that are more democratic tend to be less corrupt" with a subtitle indicating the year of the data and the source.

Democracies tend to have lower levels of corruption

What difference does it make when people can choose their leaders? One area where the right to vote for political leaders may matter is corruption.

Democracy and corruption are hard to measure. One possible way to understand how countries perform on these fronts is to ask experts who study them closely. These expert judgments aren’t perfect, but we think they’re useful.

The V-Dem project surveys experts to assess how democratic each country is. Are elections free and fair? Do all citizens have equal voting rights? Are fundamental freedoms — like speech and assembly — respected? Experts also rate how frequent corruption is in public institutions, from bribery and embezzlement to whether laws are enforced fairly.

This chart combines these expert estimates: democracy on the horizontal axis and corruption on the vertical axis, with both scores on a scale from 0 to 1.

There are four corners in the chart. In the top left, you find many countries that are both autocratic and corrupt, such as Myanmar and Russia. In the bottom right, there’s a thick cluster of nations that have stronger democratic institutions and lower levels of corruption. What also stands out is that no country appears in the top right: none are rated as both having strong democratic institutions and being highly corrupt.

This chart shows correlation, not causation — but research on the causal link suggests democratic systems can indeed help expose and reduce corruption. And there is also a causal impact running the other way: corruption can weaken democratic institutions, for instance by lowering voter turnout.

Measuring corruption will always be difficult, and no single chart can fully capture it. You can explore more evidence and perspectives in the new version of our topic page on corruption.

Article

A thumbnail for the new Our World in Data search

Introducing our new, more powerful search

Finding what you’re looking for, or discovering something new, has never been easier.

Data Insight

The UN estimates that 990 million children have died globally since 1950.

Bar chart showing annual number of children who died before age five from 1950 to 2024, with a long-term downward trend. Key points annotated: 1950 annual child deaths about 20 million, child mortality rate 23%; deaths peaked in 1960 as millions died during the "Great Leap Forward" famine in China; 2000 annual child deaths about 10 million, child mortality rate 7.6%; 2024 annual child deaths about 5 million, child mortality rate 3.6%. X-axis runs from 1950 to 2024. Data source: UN, World Population Prospects (2024). License: CC BY.

Almost one billion children have died globally since 1950

The deaths of children are daily tragedies on an enormous scale. The UN estimates that between 1950 and 2024, 990 million children died. That’s almost a billion children who died in only 75 years.

The chart shows that the world has made progress. In 1950, 23% of children born died before they were five years old. Since then, the global child mortality rate has declined to 3.6%.

In absolute terms, the number of child deaths has also declined: in 1950, 20 million children died; by the year 2000, this number had halved; and since then, it has halved again.

But the deaths of millions of young children every year remain one of the worst problems in the world and deserve much more attention.

Explore more data from the UN’s World Population Prospects in our Population & Demography Data Explorer.
Announcement

The University of Oxford’s vice-chancellor, Professor Irene Tracey, gave us a nice shout-out in her recent annual oration

Professor Tracey said:

And did you realise that Our World in Data, the first port of call for millions seeking information on ourselves and our planet, is hosted by the Oxford Martin School?

Watch her address

Learn more about the relationship between Our World in Data and the University of Oxford.